Ordinal ranking with intensity of preferenceCOOK, W. D; KRESS, M.Management science. 1985, Vol 31, Num 1, pp 26-32, issn 0025-1909Article

A method of revealing preference functionsPEARL, L; SEEDHOUSE, D. E.Omega (Oxford). 1983, Vol 11, Num 6, pp 624-625, issn 0305-0483Article

LEXIMIN AND UTILITARIAN RULES: A POINT CHARACTERIZATION.DESCHAMPS R; GEVERS L.1978; J. ECON. THEORY; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 17; NO 2; PP. 143-163; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

Preference reasoningROSSI, Francesca.Lecture notes in computer science. 2005, pp 9-12, issn 0302-9743, isbn 3-540-29238-1, 1Vol, 4 p.Conference Paper

AGGREGATION PROCEDURE FOR CARDINAL PREFERENCES: A COMMENTHYLLAND A.1980; ECONOMETRICA; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 48; NO 2; PP. 539-542; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

A comparison of hedonic rating and demand-revealing auctionsNOUSSAIR, Charles; ROBIN, Stephane; RUFFIEUX, Bernard et al.Food quality and preference. 2004, Vol 15, Num 4, pp 393-402, issn 0950-3293, 10 p.Article

SCALING AND THE LOGIC OF PREFERENCE: A POSERPIRIE GH.1979; SOCIO-ECON. PLANNG SCI.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 13; NO 3; PP. 175-176; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

PSYCHOLOGISCHE A STTETIKFORSCHUNG: BESTANDSAUF NAHME UND KRITIK = LES RECHERCHES EN PSYCHOLOGIE DE L'ART. REVUE ET CRITIQUEBORTZ J.1978; PSYCHOL. BEITR.; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 20; NO 4; PP. 401-508; ABS. ENG/FRE; BIBL. 9 P.Article

Rationality and aggregation of preferences in an ordinally fuzzy frameworkBARRETT, C. R; PATTANAIK, P. K; SALLES, M et al.Fuzzy sets and systems. 1992, Vol 49, Num 1, pp 9-13, issn 0165-0114Article

Metapreferences and the reasons for stability in social choice: thoughts on broadening and clarifying the debateGROFMAN, B; UHLANER, C.Theory and decision. 1985, Vol 19, Num 1, pp 31-50, issn 0040-5833Article

An axiomatic approach to distance on partial orderingsCOOK, W. D; KRESS, M; SEIFORD, L. M et al.RAIRO. Recherche opérationnelle. 1986, Vol 20, Num 2, pp 115-122, issn 0399-0559Article

Factoring fuzzy transitivityDASGUPTA, M; DEB, R.Fuzzy sets and systems. 2001, Vol 118, Num 3, pp 489-502, issn 0165-0114Article

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PRIVATE ALTERNATIVES DOMAINS ADMITTING ARROW SOCIAL WELFARE FUNCTIONSKALAI E; RITZ Z.1980; J. ECON. THEORY; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 22; NO 1; PP. 23-36; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

AN AXIOMATIC THEORY OF TOURNAMENT AGGREGATIONMONJARDET B.1978; MATH. OPER. RES.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 3; NO 4; PP. 334-351; BIBL. 54 REF.Article

Existence of equilibrium on a manifoldSCHOFIELD, N.Mathematics of operations research. 1984, Vol 9, Num 4, pp 545-557, issn 0364-765XArticle

Preferences and PoliticsSUNSTEIN, C. R.Philosophy & public affairs. 1991, Vol 20, Num 1, pp 3-34, issn 0048-3915Article

Attention in preferential choiceMUKHERJEE, Sumitava; SRINIVASAN, Narayanan.Decision making (neural and behavioural approaches). Progress in brain research. 2013, Vol 202, pp 117-134, issn 0079-6123, isbn 978-0-444-62604-2, 1Vol, 18 p.Book Chapter

Blinder―Oaxaca decomposition applied to sensory and preference dataTARREGA, A; BAYARRI, S; CARBONELL, I et al.Food quality and preference. 2010, Vol 21, Num 6, pp 662-665, issn 0950-3293, 4 p.Article

ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE TIME-CONSISTENT REVEALED PREFERENCESDEMUYNCK, Thomas.Theory and decision. 2009, Vol 66, Num 3, pp 283-299, issn 0040-5833, 17 p.Article

Visual preference for isochronic movement does not necessarily emerge from movement kinematics : A challenge for the motor simulation theoryBIDET-ILDEI, Christel; MEARY, David; ORLIAGUET, Jean-Pierre et al.Neuroscience letters. 2008, Vol 430, Num 3, pp 236-240, issn 0304-3940, 5 p.Article

Strict preference relations based on weak t-normsFODOR, J. C.Fuzzy sets and systems. 1991, Vol 43, Num 3, pp 327-336, issn 0165-0114Article

Can individual preference orderings ever be intransitive?MALIN, H.Omega (Oxford). 1986, Vol 14, Num 2, pp 188-189, issn 0305-0483Article

University students' food preference and practice now and during childhoodUNUSAN, N.Food quality and preference. 2006, Vol 17, Num 5, pp 362-368, issn 0950-3293, 7 p.Article

Discounted-value representations of temporal preferencesWEIBULL, J. W.Mathematics of operations research. 1985, Vol 10, Num 2, pp 244-250, issn 0364-765XArticle

Interpersonal level comparability does not imply comparability of utility differences ― a comment on NgJAFFRAY, J. Y.Theory and decision. 1985, Vol 19, Num 2, pp 201-203, issn 0040-5833Article